Asrock Z68 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z68 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 22 '21 at 22:04
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 96
1-Core 117
2-Core 203
82% 139 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 593
59% 481 Pts
64-Core 595
37% 595 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1626 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Lighting 70.5
Reflection 116
Parallax 80.2
58% 88.8 fps
MRender 51.6
Gravity 71.5
Splatting 61.8
51% 61.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 169 87 18 94 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 460
Write 409
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 95
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 13.9
4K Mixed 0.8
39% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 8.3
DQ Mixed 15.9
39% 88.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$46
823GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 134 133 134 134 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 144
Write 167
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 126
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
202% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1600 C7 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
75.4% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 24.6
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 22.1
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 53.9
74% 53.9 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z68 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock Z68 Extreme4 - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $628
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback