Monster TULPAR T7 V18.3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 123%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive307% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V18.3  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook TULPAR T7 V18.3
Memory57.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200622
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 22 '21 at 20:38
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$415
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 151
2-Core 297
98% 180 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 994
95% 782 Pts
64-Core 1,305
81% 1,305 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 99%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super Mobile)
Clevo(1558 7709) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Lighting 173
Reflection 177
Parallax 178
141% 176 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 153
Splatting 126
124% 155 fps
Poor: 98%
This bench: 128%
Great: 128%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00000 512GB
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2252 820 819 821 817 816 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
307% Outstanding
Read 2,584
Write 2,423
Mixed 1,620
SusWrite 1,057
430% 1,921 MB/s
4K Read 68.7
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 89.2
297% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,263
DQ Write 846
DQ Mixed 1009
765% 1,039 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 307%
Great: 316%
Adata SX8100NP 1TB
245GB free
Firmware: VB411D48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 585 569 428 264 80 238 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 225
Write 522
Mixed 646
SusWrite 361
100% 438 MB/s
4K Read 56.3
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 76.2
254% 88.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,218
DQ Write 655
DQ Mixed 1,087
768% 987 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 152%
Great: 336%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
79.8% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 24.5
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 27.1
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V18.3 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V18.3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $415
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback