Asus A78M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics10.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive78.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus A78M-A  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 22 '21 at 20:07
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
46.2% Average
Memory 56.4
1-Core 71.1
2-Core 134
50% 87.3 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 226
28% 216 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6770
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Lighting 14.5
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 12.9
12% 13.6 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 9.5
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct240bx5 0 240GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 168 134 133 134 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 509
Write 422
Mixed 400
SusWrite 164
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 81.8
4K Mixed 29.6
126% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 0.4
60% 145 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$22
440GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 127 125 127 128 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 129
Write 120
Mixed 73.1
SusWrite 127
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR3 1600G DDR3 1600G Kingston 99U5458-005.A00LF Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.1% Below average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 13.8
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 10.7
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A78M-A Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A78M-A - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $190
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback