PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Intel E5 M2L-8D (all builds) |
Memory | 59.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190818 |
Uptime | 6 Days |
Run Date | Oct 22 '21 at 12:55 |
Run Duration | 240 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-4640 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
|
65.9%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85CD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74
681GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1637 1517 1518 1523 1522 1524 MB/s
|
211%
Outstanding
|
|||
Maxtor STM3500630AS 500GB-$80
183GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 38 37 43 30 43 MB/s
|
26.8%
Poor
|
|||
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
885GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 76 78 79 79 79 MB/s
|
47.3%
Average
|
|||
Hitachi HDE721064SLA360 640GB
123GB free
Firmware: ST0BA36A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 81 81 81 81 MB/s
|
48.3%
Average
|
|||
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB
120GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 59 59 59 59 MB/s
|
121%
Outstanding
|
|||
General UDisk 16GB
10GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 6 6.6 6.9 6.2 MB/s
|
4.06%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393B1K70CH0- 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
79%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2689 01stBench 66%, 461 samples | 12x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 9x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples | 8x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX Vega-56AMD $170Bench 78%, 92,053 samples | 8x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 7x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 109% - Outstanding | Total price: $170 |