PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 27.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7B79 |
Motherboard | MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) (all builds) |
Memory | 23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20201215 |
Uptime | 4.5 Days |
Run Date | Aug 26 '21 at 01:46 |
Run Duration | 202 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
82.2%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 863B) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.1%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Teclast 128GB NS550-2280 128GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0616B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 4.8 8.7 9.3 8.7 30 MB/s
|
27.6%
Poor
|
|||
BT58SSD10S 256GB
27GB free
Firmware: WG1128A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 79 81 83 11 63 MB/s
|
59.7%
Above average
|
|||
Maxtor STM3500630AS 500GB-$80
382GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 76 76 76 76 MB/s
|
42.7%
Average
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
462GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 86 87 87 87 MB/s
|
55.6%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
71%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 11 | 9 | 60 | 23" | 1280 696 | GSM59CA 2D HD LG TV |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 1,392x |
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples | 683x |
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $153Bench 96%, 383,420 samples | 328x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 283x |
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples | 280x |
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 272x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $487 |