Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics89.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 22 '21 at 10:26
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 119
2-Core 230
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 527
57% 452 Pts
64-Core 610
38% 610 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2181 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.8% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 166
Parallax 102
86% 125 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 131
Splatting 117
97% 118 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY128HDHP-000 128GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 124 115 119 110 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 463
Write 381
Mixed 276
SusWrite 126
69% 311 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 18.3
4K Mixed 22.5
84% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 37.9
DQ Mixed 70.6
65% 105 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 105%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
5GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3GH
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 84.9
Write 74.3
Mixed 50.3
52% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 74%
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38
89GB free
Firmware: 3CNR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 70 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 74.6
Write 73.1
Mixed 48
SusWrite 70.8
49% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
105% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 42%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
12GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 122 116 126 121 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 132
Write 116
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 121
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 16GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 30.3
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 26.1
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,079 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $417
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback