Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics86.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive54.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 22 '21 at 10:19
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 110
2-Core 197
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 592
56% 465 Pts
64-Core 598
37% 598 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.2% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 154
Parallax 94.5
84% 117 fps
MRender 96.1
Gravity 126
Splatting 111
91% 111 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY128HDHP-000 128GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 93 94 89 84 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 456
Write 389
Mixed 266
SusWrite 105
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 16.7
4K Mixed 21
80% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 40.7
DQ Mixed 52.5
56% 96.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 105%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
5GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3GH
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 82.9
Write 79.1
Mixed 47.4
52% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 74%
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38
89GB free
Firmware: 3CNR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 72 72 72 69 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 69.8
Write 70.6
Mixed 49.1
SusWrite 70.4
48% 65 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
103% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 42%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
12GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 122 124 118 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 120
Write 116
Mixed 72.4
SusWrite 122
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 16GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 30.3
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 25.7
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 87%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $442
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback