Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 220 5,045 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	42% Average	Memory 71.2 1-Core 38.2 2-Core 81 42% 63.5 Pts	4-Core 76.9 8-Core 81.7 10% 79.3 Pts	64-Core 78.9 5% 78.9 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 240 4,978 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Dell(1028 210B) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.6 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	5.35% Terrible	Lighting 6.73 Reflection 8.31 Parallax 10.1 6% 8.37 fps	MRender 4.57 Gravity 7.43 Splatting 6.39 5% 6.13 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.35% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 209GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.1% Below average	Read 239 Write 164 Mixed 181 43% 195 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 17.2 4K Mixed 12.8 49% 15.2 MB/s	DQ Read 19.2 DQ Write 47.2 DQ Mixed 14.5 16% 27 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR128X64D3U1333C9 ACR256X64D3U13C9G 3GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1066, 1066 MHz 1024, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	24.2% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 9.2 23% 8.03 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 7.5 18% 6.37 GB/s	Latency 98.6 41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 24%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce 6150SE nForce 430NvidiaBench 0%, 4,836 samples	5x
Radeon HD 6450AMDBench 2%, 32,407 samples	1x
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples	1x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

RAM
NT1GC64BH4B0PF-CG Kingston ACR256X64D3U13C9G 3GBNanyaBench 21%, 14 samples	3x
M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 14,844 samples	2x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x4GBKingstonBench 27%, 3,140 samples	1x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16