GAME SLAYER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive328% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemGAME SLAYER  (all builds)
MotherboardGAME SLAYER
Memory21.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '21 at 23:44
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Memory 68.1
1-Core 178
2-Core 343
102% 196 Pts
4-Core 682
8-Core 1,244
116% 963 Pts
64-Core 1,519
94% 1,519 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
MSI(1462 12EA) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9613
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Lighting 145
Reflection 128
Parallax 130
118% 134 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 102
Splatting 85.5
83% 104 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac NVMe SSD 500GB
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AAT8KA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1595 1655 1668 1662 750 788 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
328% Outstanding
Read 2,498
Write 1,665
Mixed 1,402
SusWrite 1,353
386% 1,729 MB/s
4K Read 63.8
4K Write 215
4K Mixed 93.9
331% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 838
DQ Write 1,108
DQ Mixed 536
526% 827 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 328%
Great: 319%
Kingchuxing 256GB 256GB
216GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 755 348 347 345 343 346 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
178% Outstanding
Read 1,252
Write 898
Mixed 1060
SusWrite 414
202% 906 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 56.9
210% 76.6 MB/s
DQ Read 714
DQ Write 1,011
DQ Mixed 732
590% 819 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 178%
Great: 172%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905700-026.A00G Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FRS 24GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.4% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 17.5
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 16.9
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SLAYER Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: GAME SLAYER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback