GAME SLAYER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive324% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemGAME SLAYER  (all builds)
MotherboardGAME SLAYER
Memory19.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '21 at 18:08
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Memory 66.2
1-Core 176
2-Core 353
102% 198 Pts
4-Core 682
8-Core 1,230
115% 956 Pts
64-Core 1,436
89% 1,436 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 97%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
MSI(1462 12EA) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9613
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 149
Reflection 128
Parallax 131
121% 136 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 103
Splatting 86.2
83% 104 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 107%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac NVMe SSD 500GB
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AAT8KA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1628 1641 1648 1682 1034 564 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
324% Outstanding
Read 2,500
Write 1,694
Mixed 1,416
SusWrite 1,366
389% 1,744 MB/s
4K Read 60.1
4K Write 219
4K Mixed 90.2
322% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 747
DQ Write 1,098
DQ Mixed 504
498% 783 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 324%
Great: 319%
Kingchuxing 256GB 256GB
216GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 757 347 348 348 348 348 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1293
Write 922
Mixed 1,034
SusWrite 416
204% 916 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 58
208% 77.9 MB/s
DQ Read 715
DQ Write 1,022
DQ Mixed 726
589% 821 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 180%
Great: 172%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905700-026.A00G Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FRS 24GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.4% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 25.2
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 17.5
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SLAYER Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: GAME SLAYER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback