MSI B360M PRO-VDH (MS-7B24)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics24.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B24
MotherboardMSI B360M PRO-VDH (MS-7B24)  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180402
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateOct 21 '21 at 00:29
Run Duration266 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G5400-$55
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
45.6% Average
Memory 66.1
1-Core 56.7
2-Core 102
46% 75 Pts
4-Core 144
8-Core 168
20% 156 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.2% Poor
Lighting 31.9
Reflection 32.5
Parallax 30.5
26% 31.6 fps
MRender 31.2
Gravity 28.3
Splatting 19.5
21% 26.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
971GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 105 128 123 109 130 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 136
Write 131
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 115
74% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
136% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2666 C16 Series 8502 2666 C16 Series 8502 2666 C16 Series 24GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.6% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 14.2
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 11.9
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B360M PRO-VDH (MS-7B24) Builds (Compare 2,555 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI B360M PRO-VDH (MS-7B24)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $556
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback