Lenovo 1095DP4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 1095DP4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120921
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 20 '21 at 13:46
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 0
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 63.6
2-Core 127
55% 89.7 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 474
43% 360 Pts
64-Core 488
30% 488 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 62%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gainward(10B0 13C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.2% Average
Lighting 54.8
Reflection 63.9
Parallax 57.4
45% 58.7 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 56.9
Splatting 50.2
46% 57.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMPC256 256GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 208 214 205 192 178 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.8% Average
Read 234
Write 200
Mixed 162
SusWrite 198
45% 198 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 19.3
66% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 91.9
DQ Mixed 119
91% 126 MB/s
Hitachi HUS726020AL 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: T907
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 101 104 105 103 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 182
Write 122
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 104
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
220% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 112%
Hitachi HUS726020ALE610 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: T907
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 186 192 188 191 191 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 95.3
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 189
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.8
206% 2 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 107%
Great: 116%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 2TB
2TB free, PID ab21
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 92 92 92 91 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 91.8
Write 70.8
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 90.8
100% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4C 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.9% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 7
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 4.1
16% 5.43 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1095DP4 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Lenovo 1095DP4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback