Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	46.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2720QM-$85 7,798 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Memory 81.6 1-Core 57.8 2-Core 114 53% 84.5 Pts	4-Core 189 8-Core 295 30% 242 Pts	64-Core 289 18% 289 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000M 3,227 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Dell(1028 04A3) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 307.45 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 4% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 178GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6C SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 59 58 127 59 59 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Read 454 Write 386 Mixed 380 SusWrite 134 76% 339 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 42.8 4K Mixed 0.5 60% 22.6 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 7.5 DQ Mixed 18.9 29% 60.3 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 92%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 930GB free Firmware: AX0R SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 97 97 97 96 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 94.7 Write 94.6 Mixed 33.6 SusWrite 96.6 58% 79.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 0D9B M471B5173EB0-YK0 M471B5773CHS-CK0 14GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.2% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 15 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 12.8 34% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 77.7 52% 77.7 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro 1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 6,108 samples	227x
Quadro 2000MNvidiaBench 5%, 3,227 samples	170x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	85x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	26x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	16x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 45%, 885 samples	12x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $113

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16