Lenovo 82MA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 82MA  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2160 x 1350 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210104
Uptime5.7 Days
Run DateOct 20 '21 at 10:21
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 74.3
1-Core 175
2-Core 336
102% 195 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 665
73% 575 Pts
64-Core 665
41% 665 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 382F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9030
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Lighting 27.7
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 25.5
23% 23.9 fps
MRender 18
Gravity 26.2
Splatting 19.7
17% 21.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ1T0HALB-000L2 1TB
921GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BL2QFXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1341 1305 1290 454 516 537 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 1,215
Write 1,293
Mixed 1,102
SusWrite 907
254% 1,129 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 76.1
289% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,161
DQ Write 849
DQ Mixed 1,094
794% 1,035 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 237%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATS2G64HZ-3G2B1 1x16GB
1 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 13.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 15.9
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82MA Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82MA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback