Gigabyte GA-B75-D3V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B75-D3V  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131023
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 20 '21 at 03:12
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 73
2-Core 191
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 498
53% 421 Pts
64-Core 502
31% 502 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Gigabyte(1458 2303) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1840 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.8.2
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.3% Average
Lighting 58.1
Reflection 62.5
Parallax 84.8
47% 68.5 fps
MRender 64.6
Gravity 66.6
Splatting 46.6
47% 59.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175
354GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 197 170 187 117 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 431
Write 427
Mixed 336
SusWrite 184
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 12.8
86% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 22.5
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 153
101% 115 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 92%
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 512GB
448GB free
Firmware: VB431D51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 517 582 620 592 645 652 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 1,002
Write 762
Mixed 793
SusWrite 601
177% 789 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 39.6
133% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 525
DQ Mixed 476
345% 439 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 137%
Great: 309%
Kingston SMS200S3240G 240GB
190GB free
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 168 156 171 169 176 MB/s
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.7% Above average
Read 222
Write 229
Mixed 194
SusWrite 170
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 33.2
104% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 133
106% 147 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 84%
Marvell Raid VD 0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: MV.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 134 136 134 137 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 301
Write 112
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 135
115% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.2
249% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 125%
Great: 157%
Prolific BIG 9TB
6TB free, PID 2775
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 23 23 23 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.6% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 23.1
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 23
32% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.8% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 18.1
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 17.4
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B75-D3V Builds (Compare 674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75-D3V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback