Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3450 3,425 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	67.8% Good	Memory 93.5 1-Core 79.7 2-Core 141 65% 105 Pts	4-Core 230 8-Core 354 36% 292 Pts	64-Core 353 22% 353 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6970 9,594 User benchmarks, average bench 20% AMD(1002 0B00) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	20% Very poor	Lighting 25.3 Reflection 30.7 Parallax 29.5 21% 28.5 fps	MRender 24.3 Gravity 26.2 Splatting 19.4 19% 23.3 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 22%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39 77,177 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 205GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR043 SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 225 224 225 221 221 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	59.2% Above average	Read 206 Write 220 Mixed 212 SusWrite 222 49% 215 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 49.2 4K Mixed 27.4 91% 32.2 MB/s	DQ Read 206 DQ Write 195 DQ Mixed 127 116% 176 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 123%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown EBJ21UE8BDF0-AE-F 2x2GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 10.7 35% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 11.7 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 60.9 66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 37%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples	4x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	3x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	3x

SSD
Vi550 S3 256GBVerbatimBench 67%, 433 samples	4x
MZ7LN256HCHP-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 81%, 7,649 samples	3x
Raid 0 Volume 480GBIntelBench 105%, 11,256 samples	2x

RAM
9905471-009.A00LF 4x4GBUnknownBench 40%, 21 samples	4x
HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 46%, 5,138 samples	3x
HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 57%, 2,366 samples	3x

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $149