MSI MEG Z590 ACE (MS-7D04)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 241%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 245%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 120%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics207% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive484% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D04
MotherboardMSI MEG Z590 ACE (MS-7D04)  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210922
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '21 at 21:43
Run Duration397 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900K-$254
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Memory 95.2
1-Core 202
2-Core 392
122% 229 Pts
4-Core 772
8-Core 1,365
129% 1,068 Pts
64-Core 1,834
114% 1,834 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 120%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$580
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
207% Outstanding
Lighting 301
Reflection 288
Parallax 317
245% 302 fps
MRender 354
Gravity 256
Splatting 191
210% 267 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 207%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-AG41TB 1TB
882GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM13.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3658 3761 3940 3894 3963 3956 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
484% Outstanding
Read 1952
Write 3,605
Mixed 1,932
SusWrite 3,862
646% 2,838 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 266
4K Mixed 93.8
337% 137 MB/s
DQ Read 1,696
DQ Write 1,310
DQ Mixed 1,586
1,164% 1531 MB/s
Poor: 191%
This bench: 484%
Great: 473%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
931GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2347 2196 1538 1537 1564 1551 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
389% Outstanding
Read 2,516
Write 2286
Mixed 1459
SusWrite 1,789
451% 2,012 MB/s
4K Read 67.7
4K Write 206
4K Mixed 99.6
339% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,823
DQ Write 1,513
DQ Mixed 1,632
1,232% 1,656 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 389%
Great: 410%
FOX SPIRIT PM18 960GB
894GB free
Firmware: S1111A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1542 1546 1547 1549 1551 1541 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 1,555
Write 1,487
Mixed 854
SusWrite 1,546
306% 1,360 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 232
4K Mixed 22.8
225% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 900
DQ Write 1,032
DQ Mixed 476
494% 803 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 263%
Great: 260%
FOX SPIRIT PM18 960GB
894GB free
Firmware: S1111A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1494 1505 1513 1518 1520 1521 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 1420
Write 1,484
Mixed 845
SusWrite 1,512
296% 1,315 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 232
4K Mixed 23.4
222% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 900
DQ Write 1,033
DQ Mixed 479
496% 804 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 255%
Great: 260%
WD WD20EFAX-68FB5N0 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 188 192 188 191 189 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 28% Great: 101%
Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 320GB
28GB free, PID 5021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 34.7
Write 32.5
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 40
45% 32.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX Essencore Limited KD48GU880-32A160X KHX3200C16D4/8GX Essencore Limited KD48GU880-32A160X 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
117% Outstanding
MC Read 43.5
MC Write 43.2
MC Mixed 38
119% 41.6 GB/s
SC Read 30.6
SC Write 45.5
SC Mixed 36.2
107% 37.4 GB/s
Latency 56.5
71% 56.5 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 117%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG Z590 ACE (MS-7D04) Builds (Compare 1,073 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 206%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 208%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG Z590 ACE (MS-7D04)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $941
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback