Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory21.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateOct 19 '21 at 18:11
Run Duration310 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 132
2-Core 251
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 671
69% 555 Pts
64-Core 688
43% 688 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9316
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
6.56% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 8.1
6% 7.87 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 11.4
8% 9.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.56%
Great: 6%
AMD R9 Fury-X-$781
CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
62.7% Good
Lighting 83.8
Reflection 67.9
Parallax 120
68% 90.4 fps
MRender 61.3
Gravity 94.9
Splatting 42.1
52% 66.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,096
Write 1,754
Mixed 1,536
399% 1,795 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 77.1
248% 87.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,234
DQ Write 818
DQ Mixed 1,036
770% 1,029 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
39GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 376 206 194 190 189 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 432
Write 413
Mixed 356
SusWrite 260
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 54.6
187% 66.4 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 361
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 107%
Great: 134%
Crucial BX100 500GB-$49
69GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 388 389 285 295 264 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 377
Mixed 314
SusWrite 336
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 42.3
137% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 209
176% 256 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
461GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 118 118 117 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 150
Write 132
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 116
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 107%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB
528GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 94 94 95 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 94.1
Write 95.3
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 94
122% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 32GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.1% Excellent
MC Read 30
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 26.5
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 24.5
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 14,062 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $891
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback