Monster TULPAR T7 V19.5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics94.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V19.5  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V19.5
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '21 at 15:57
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Memory 92.8
1-Core 129
2-Core 258
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 748
76% 614 Pts
64-Core 916
57% 916 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 91%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile)
Device(1D05 105D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9613
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.9% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 115
Parallax 118
96% 117 fps
MRender 150
Gravity 106
Splatting 95
93% 117 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 99%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 266 262 257 254 253 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 2,123
Write 998
Mixed 1061
SusWrite 271
245% 1,113 MB/s
4K Read 59.8
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 76.1
252% 85.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,178
DQ Write 984
DQ Mixed 1,068
803% 1,077 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 228%
Great: 296%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
396GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 124 123 116 116 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 71.3
Write 108
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 120
66% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.2
88% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2666 C19 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
83.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 23
84% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 26.3
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V19.5 Builds (Compare 175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V19.5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback