Monster TULPAR T7 V19.5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics97.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V19.5  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V19.5
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 29 '21 at 09:38
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 82.9
1-Core 132
2-Core 257
86% 157 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 718
74% 595 Pts
64-Core 880
54% 880 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile)
Device(1D05 105D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7212
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 115
Parallax 117
96% 117 fps
MRender 166
Gravity 109
Splatting 99.8
99% 125 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 99%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1778 926 602 608 603 601 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1,350
Write 1,738
Mixed 865
SusWrite 853
270% 1,202 MB/s
4K Read 61.4
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 79.6
261% 88.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,242
DQ Write 944
DQ Mixed 1057
800% 1,081 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 236%
Great: 296%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
297GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 142 148 144 141 147 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 69.4
Write 107
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 144
72% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2666 C19 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 22.7
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 34.7
SC Mixed 26
76% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V19.5 Builds (Compare 175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V19.5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback