Topsee P9X79-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	25.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Topsee P9X79-PLUS (all builds)
Motherboard	TOPSEE P9X79-PLUS
Memory	23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170309
Uptime	3.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 19 '21 at 12:20
Run Duration	175 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel @ 2.90GHz 39 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	58.9% Above average	Memory 69.8 1-Core 76.7 2-Core 153 58% 99.7 Pts	4-Core 258 8-Core 504 45% 381 Pts	64-Core 746 46% 746 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Nvidia(10DE 11C0) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.7% Poor	Lighting 32.2 Reflection 33.8 Parallax 32.1 26% 32.7 fps	MRender 36.9 Gravity 33.2 Splatting 23.1 25% 31.1 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 247GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR032 SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 210 238 238 237 238 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	58% Above average	Read 253 Write 237 Mixed 233 SusWrite 224 53% 237 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 35.3 4K Mixed 29.3 91% 29.2 MB/s	DQ Read 50.6 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 84.1 76% 111 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 125%
SMI 2258 SSD 480GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 117GB free Firmware: Q0526A SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 216 235 235 234 235 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.8% Above average	Read 254 Write 240 Mixed 236 SusWrite 224 54% 239 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 40.2 4K Mixed 29.9 95% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 77.6 DQ Mixed 84.3 65% 88.9 MB/s
Poor: 98% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 115%
SMI 2258 SSD 480GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 248GB free Firmware: Q0526A SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 387 426 426 423 424 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Read 476 Write 443 Mixed 416 SusWrite 404 98% 435 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 61.7 4K Mixed 38.5 124% 42.7 MB/s	DQ Read 29.6 DQ Write 74.5 DQ Mixed 119 72% 74.4 MB/s
Poor: 98% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 115%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NVD2G7T3510FC 2x16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.2% Poor	MC Read 10.6 MC Write 9.7 MC Mixed 8.8 28% 9.7 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 8.4 27% 9.3 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P9X79-PLUS Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

System: Topsee P9X79-PLUS

CPU
@ 2.90GHzIntelBench 71%, 39 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	1x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	1x

SSD
2258 SSD 480GBSMIBench 109%, 15 samples	2x

RAM
NVD2G7T3510FC 2x16GBUnknownBench 29%, 2 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $101

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16