Acer Swift SF314-510G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Swift SF314-510G  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Brahma_TL
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210603
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateOct 19 '21 at 12:19
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 74.9
1-Core 156
2-Core 304
95% 178 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 689
75% 595 Pts
64-Core 684
42% 684 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Acer(1025 1482) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 20.1
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 25.3
16% 25.5 fps
MRender 21.8
Gravity 29.1
Splatting 16.4
18% 22.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1114 512GB
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21113000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 796 411 417 429 433 433 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 1,708
Write 1,640
Mixed 1,467
SusWrite 487
297% 1,325 MB/s
4K Read 54.7
4K Write 214
4K Mixed 82.5
302% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,238
DQ Write 1,044
DQ Mixed 991
783% 1,091 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 242%
Great: 235%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HCNNNBKMMLXR-NEE 8x1GB
8 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 40.7
MC Write 58.5
MC Mixed 40.2
133% 46.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 44.3
SC Mixed 18.2
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 120%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Swift SF314-510G Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Acer Swift SF314-510G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback