ECS H81H3-M7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardECS H81H3-M7  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140704
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateOct 19 '21 at 11:55
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 75.1
1-Core 94.2
2-Core 154
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 273
36% 268 Pts
64-Core 257
16% 257 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Nvidia(10DE 1073) 1GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.2
Reflection 19.2
Parallax 18.5
16% 19.3 fps
MRender 24.9
Gravity 20.7
Splatting 17.1
17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 438
Write 444
Mixed 352
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 58.6
4K Mixed 44.9
137% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 352
264% 352 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
345GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 116 125 127 128 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 120
Write 123
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 122
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
186% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 109%
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB
276GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 104 101 104 106 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 113
Write 103
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 102
73% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 0.7
355% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 102%
SAMSUNG UFD 8GB
7GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 6 5.9 6.4 6.4 6.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
7.23% Terrible
Read 25.4
Write 2.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 6.2
9% 9.57 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
34% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.23%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 1311 M2X4G64CB8HG5N-DG 8GB
1600, 1867 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.7% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 16.1
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 13.5
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81H3-M7 Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H81H3-M7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $203
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback