HP 580-016na

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 580-016na  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F1
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170330
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateOct 18 '21 at 09:43
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 90.4
1-Core 126
2-Core 253
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 485
67% 495 Pts
64-Core 502
31% 502 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Lighting 44.1
Reflection 43
Parallax 40.7
36% 42.6 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 43.7
Splatting 28.5
29% 36.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 81 79 75 70 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 452
Write 251
Mixed 160
SusWrite 78.3
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 21.4
121% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 56.4
92% 183 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
147GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 14 14 19 21 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82% Excellent
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 23.9
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 25.1
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 82%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 580-016na Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: HP 580-016na

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback