Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 205%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics184% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211001
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 18 '21 at 04:38
Run Duration317 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Memory 86.6
1-Core 156
2-Core 311
100% 185 Pts
4-Core 602
8-Core 1,190
106% 896 Pts
64-Core 2,187
135% 2,187 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Asus(1043 86C4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3700 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Lighting 260
Reflection 225
Parallax 283
212% 256 fps
MRender 283
Gravity 248
Splatting 185
190% 239 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 184%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Addlink M.2 PCIE G3x4 NVMe 1TB
876GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1400 923 945 964 973 969 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 1,499
Write 2,666
Mixed 1,716
SusWrite 1,029
391% 1,727 MB/s
4K Read 59.7
4K Write 212
4K Mixed 87.8
315% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,300
DQ Write 965
DQ Mixed 1126
843% 1,130 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 270%
Great: 287%
Sdlf1crm -017T-1HST 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: ZR03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 432 431 430 430 430 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 317
Write 426
Mixed 332
SusWrite 431
85% 376 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 52.7
4K Mixed 34.2
113% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 217
165% 222 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 84%
APS-SE20Q-2T 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: ECFM53.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2553 2586 2588 2588 2584 2592 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
345% Outstanding
Read 1,478
Write 2,462
Mixed 1,507
SusWrite 2,582
456% 2,007 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 73.5
242% 89.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,306
DQ Write 1071
DQ Mixed 1,235
912% 1204 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 345%
Great: 369%
Aps-sl3n -1T 1TB
926GB free
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 442 448 283 101 248 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 240
Mixed 386
SusWrite 325
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 85.4
4K Mixed 36.2
141% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 162
129% 179 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda Pro 10TB (2016)-$139
7TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 234 233 233 233 232 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 46.4
MC Write 41.4
MC Mixed 41.9
124% 43.2 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 39.1
85% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 116%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,048 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,695
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback