Asus F2A85-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive15.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus F2A85-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141125
Uptime6 Days
Run DateOct 17 '21 at 19:27
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 68.5
1-Core 75.5
2-Core 139
56% 94.2 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 232
31% 233 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.3% Above average
Lighting 69.3
Reflection 75.1
Parallax 69.2
56% 71.2 fps
MRender 69.1
Gravity 69
Splatting 67.6
56% 68.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct480bx5 0 480GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 368 12 7.5 116 248 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
15.6% Very poor
Read 126
Write 5
Mixed 15.4
SusWrite 171
18% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
0% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
208GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 106 107 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 110
Write 103
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 105
70% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$20
179GB free
Firmware: 15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 93 94 98 94 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 93.1
Write 102
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 90.3
62% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/4G 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.4% Below average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 12.5
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 11
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F2A85-M PRO Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A85-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $88
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback