Medion MD34190/2587

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMedion MD34190/2587  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B550A4-EM
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '21 at 10:11
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 116
2-Core 214
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 644
62% 512 Pts
64-Core 873
54% 873 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
MSI(1462 3802) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.3% Average
Lighting 57.9
Reflection 57.9
Parallax 50.4
47% 55.4 fps
MRender 43.3
Gravity 51.7
Splatting 46.5
39% 47.2 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E12-256G-PHISON-SSD-B3-BB1 256GB
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 711
Write 449
Mixed 562
127% 574 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 56
186% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 706
DQ Write 510
DQ Mixed 260
288% 492 MB/s
Poor: 93% Great: 187%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
557GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 191
Write 110
Mixed 38.6
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
126% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 30.5
99% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 27.6
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MD34190/2587 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Medion MD34190/2587

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback