Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3450 6,637 User benchmarks, average bench 27% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	29% Poor	Memory 36.6 1-Core 39 2-Core 71.3 29% 49 Pts	4-Core 120 8-Core 146 17% 133 Pts	64-Core 148 9% 148 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 5064) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4541 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.09% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 1.2 1% 1.1 fps	MRender 1.7 Gravity 1.2 Splatting 1.8 1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.09% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0B-00YS70 1TB 39,874 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 892GB free (System drive) Firmware: 415020WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 196 304 296 315 272 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	57.7% Above average	Read 294 Write 267 Mixed 185 SusWrite 281 58% 257 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 31.9 4K Mixed 20.7 68% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 143 DQ Mixed 131 109% 158 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 115%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.6% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 8.2 25% 8.73 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 3.3 9% 3.27 GB/s	Latency 219 18% 219 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	11x
Core™i7-6300UIntel®Bench 29%, 1 sample	1x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	9x
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	3x

SSD
SD8SN8U128G1001 128GBSandiskBench 70%, 1,303 samples	6x
SD9SN8W128G1001 128GBSandiskBench 71%, 157 samples	3x
MZNTY128HDHP-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 80%, 1,655 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16