Lenovo 81MQS02B00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81MQS02B00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '21 at 05:07
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9220C RADEON R5, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G
Socket FT4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Memory 35.6
1-Core 44.2
2-Core 65.2
29% 48.3 Pts
4-Core 58.1
8-Core 63.4
8% 60.8 Pts
64-Core 57.7
4% 57.7 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Legend(17AA 39EA) 80MB
Ram: 80MB, Driver: 19.40.44
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
2.16% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 2.9
2% 2.6 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 4.4
3% 3.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.16%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RPFTJ128PDD2EWX 128GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 144 99 118 119 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 365
Write 157
Mixed 169
SusWrite 120
45% 203 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 15.5
4K Mixed 11.6
40% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 93.8
DQ Write 86.8
DQ Mixed 87.3
66% 89.3 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTAF5121G64HZ-2G6E1 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 1200 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.2% Very poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.53 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 5.2
13% 4.57 GB/s
Latency 224
18% 224 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 21%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81MQS02B00 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81MQS02B00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $336
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback