Lenovo 81MQS02B00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81MQS02B00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191204
Uptime19.1 Days
Run DateOct 03 '21 at 10:26
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9220C RADEON R5, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G
Socket FT4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Memory 21
1-Core 39
2-Core 39.9
20% 33.3 Pts
4-Core 56.5
8-Core 55.4
8% 56 Pts
64-Core 53.8
3% 53.8 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Legend(17AA 39EA) 80MB
Ram: 80MB, Driver: 19.40.44
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
1.91% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 4
Parallax 3.5
2% 3.13 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.91%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RPFTJ128PDD2EWX 128GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.9
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 266
Write 250
Mixed 137
48% 218 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 14.5
4K Mixed 9.4
32% 10.7 MB/s
DQ Read 43.6
DQ Write 67.9
DQ Mixed 70.9
49% 60.8 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTAF5121G64HZ-2G6E1 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 1200 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 3.8
13% 4.47 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 2.6
9% 3.13 GB/s
Latency 313
13% 313 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 21%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 6: 0R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
6% 11% 37 41 24 60 14" 1280 720 IVO057D
Typical 81MQS02B00 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81MQS02B00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback