PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 6.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P5K Deluxe (all builds) |
Memory | 6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20081216 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 16 '21 at 20:12 |
Run Duration | 238 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X3380
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz
|
49.8%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro 2000
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
|
6.07%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$245
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 172 176 179 178 179 MB/s
|
62.3%
Good
|
|||
Sandisk S3 1T02 1TB
877GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 40101000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 84 88 89 93 95 MB/s
|
50.4%
Above average
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
203GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 111 115 117 114 114 MB/s
|
60.1%
Good
|
|||
WD Purple Surveillance 6TB (2017)-$129
581GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 88 88 90 93 93 MB/s
|
68.6%
Good
|
|||
Generic 2.0 Reader -0 2GB
2GB free, PID 0111
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
|
6.21%
Terrible
|
|||
Generic- USB3.0 CRW-SD/MS 16GB
14GB free, PID 0321
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.5 MB/s
|
13.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Generic- USB3.0 CRW-MS 2GB
2GB free, PID 0321
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.2 4.4 4.4 4.5 4.5 MB/s
|
5.27%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
|
20.6%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 11x |
Core2 QuadIntel $90Bench 43%, 5,765 samples | 8x |
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 5x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 3x |
GeForce GT 440NvidiaBench 4%, 14,286 samples | 3x |
GTX 560Nvidia $180Bench 14%, 23,273 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 49% - Average | Total price: $281 |