Lenovo 2325AEG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 2325AEG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2325AEG
Memory6.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190924
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 16 '21 at 09:54
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 68.1
1-Core 85.4
2-Core 134
57% 95.8 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 203
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21FA) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 3
3% 2.97 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 120GB-$75
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 110 115 111 120 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 362
Write 74.6
Mixed 192
SusWrite 114
41% 186 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 19.8
4K Mixed 14.2
47% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 148
123% 181 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-417.A00LF Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.7% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 13.9
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.4
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2325AEG Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2325AEG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback