Google Panther

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGoogle Panther  (all builds)
MotherboardGOOGLE Panther
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210725
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 15 '21 at 20:04
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4600U
CPU0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 66.9
1-Core 73.3
2-Core 124
53% 88 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 169
22% 165 Pts
64-Core 185
11% 185 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Device(1AE0 C000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
1.7% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 2.5
2% 1.97 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 2.5
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.7%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS120GMTS420S 120GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 339 375 355 374 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 348
Write 368
Mixed 311
SusWrite 313
76% 335 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 14.2
62% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 67.7
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 27.8
71% 141 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 87%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
20GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 9 9.6 11 9.2 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
5.15% Terrible
Read 15.2
Write 5.2
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 10.6
11% 8.88 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.15%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown (0) None 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.7% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 15.1
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.9
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Panther Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Google Panther

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback