Lenovo 20EQS3B40K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20EQS3B40K  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20EQS3B40K
Memory16 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200618
Uptime27.8 Days
Run DateOct 15 '21 at 16:51
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 94.6
2-Core 157
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 445
43% 352 Pts
64-Core 509
32% 509 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 70%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M1000M
Legend(17AA 222E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Lighting 15.1
Reflection 15.6
Parallax 15.3
12% 15.3 fps
MRender 20.1
Gravity 17.4
Splatting 14
14% 17.2 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 14%
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 222E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8854
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
4.24% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 6.7
5% 9.63 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 6
Splatting 0.1
4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.24%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN512HAJQ-000L7 512GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT24L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 68 71 69 114 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 438
Write 227
Mixed 311
SusWrite 111
60% 272 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 32.9
110% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 251
195% 262 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 22
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 19.1
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 69%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20EQS3B40K Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20EQS3B40K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback