Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics96.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive295% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211001
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '21 at 06:48
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$172
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Memory 81.9
1-Core 151
2-Core 301
96% 178 Pts
4-Core 595
8-Core 1,157
104% 876 Pts
64-Core 1453
90% 1453 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$234
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 112
Parallax 128
99% 121 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 106
Splatting 97
91% 113 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 959 668 667 664 647 635 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
295% Outstanding
Read 2,539
Write 2,371
Mixed 1,693
SusWrite 707
408% 1,828 MB/s
4K Read 66.8
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 91
308% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,357
DQ Write 1,093
DQ Mixed 1205
908% 1,219 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 295%
Great: 340%
Samsung MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GB
39GB free
Firmware: EXT0100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 116 100 60 60 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 488
Write 115
Mixed 151
SusWrite 94.7
46% 212 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 95.9
4K Mixed 27.9
145% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 66.8
97% 188 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 79%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
401GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 167 168 169 168 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 137
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 168
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.3
258% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 104%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$32
399GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 123 124 124 124 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 187
Write 185
Mixed 78.4
SusWrite 122
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
97% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 39.7
99% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 39.3
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 97%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,043 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI - $276

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,093
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback