Fujitsu LIFEBOOK S935

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK S935  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB284
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160413
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 13 '21 at 23:01
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5600U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 77.3
1-Core 101
2-Core 174
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 211
27% 205 Pts
64-Core 245
15% 245 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 1896) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
3.82% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 5.2
3% 3.93 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 6.7
5% 5.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.82%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-00007 256GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0306Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 202 239 249 253 249 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 455
Write 248
Mixed 182
SusWrite 231
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 29
122% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 81.6
118% 222 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.3% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 14.7
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 13.3
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK S935 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK S935

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback