Apple MacPro6,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemApple MacPro6,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F60DEB81FF30ACF6
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3840x2160x4294967296 szín, 3840x2160x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '21 at 22:15
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2
, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 101
2-Core 203
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 732
66% 556 Pts
64-Core 951
59% 951 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro D700 (FireGL V)
Apple(106B 0127) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 20.45.40.10
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.7% Poor
Lighting 34.2
Reflection 24.6
Parallax 40.7
28% 33.2 fps
MRender 21.3
Gravity 32.6
Splatting 16.3
19% 23.4 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO 500GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3106
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 260 269 235 223 237 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 293
Write 306
Mixed 293
SusWrite 247
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 30.2
103% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 155
109% 138 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 208%
WD Game Drive 2TB
155GB free, PID 2630
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 68 57 102 111 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 56.1
Write 53.6
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 84.1
80% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.3
155% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x484D54343531553742465238432D52442020 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 48.4
MC Write 36.3
MC Mixed 36.4
115% 40.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 12.3
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 102%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro6,1 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Apple MacPro6,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $635
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback