Asrock X370 Killer SLI/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive248% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X370 Killer SLI/ac  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 19 '17 at 00:13
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 78.9
1-Core 117
2-Core 235
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 913
82% 693 Pts
64-Core 1,278
79% 1,278 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$230
PNY(196E 1211) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 385.12
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 158
Reflection 190
Parallax 169
128% 172 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 164
Splatting 122
111% 137 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 118%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
355GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 2,273
Write 1,403
Mixed 1,471
379% 1,715 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 49.4
192% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 28.8
93% 202 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 248%
Great: 283%
Intel 535 Series 480GB-$180
271GB free
Firmware: RG21 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
66% Good
Read 514
Write 224
Mixed 310
77% 350 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 20.7
4K Mixed 21.7
80% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 93.4
DQ Mixed 51
66% 123 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66%
Great: 69%
PNY SSD2SC480G1CS1754D117-514 480GB
208GB free
Firmware: CS111101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 413
Write 404
Mixed 398
90% 405 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 70.3
4K Mixed 33.4
116% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 61.3
102% 197 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 89%
Great: 99%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93
3TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 150
Mixed 142
116% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 2.67
4K Mixed 0.28
117% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93
3TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 150
Write 155
Mixed 140
111% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 2.47
4K Mixed 0.28
113% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2934 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
MC Read 39.7
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 32.9
103% 35.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 37.4
SC Mixed 29.4
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Killer SLI/ac Builds (Compare 376 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Killer SLI/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $391
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback