Asrock X370 Killer SLI/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X370 Killer SLI/ac  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170721
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateAug 11 '17 at 17:28
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 79.8
1-Core 122
2-Core 245
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 915
84% 703 Pts
64-Core 1,329
82% 1,329 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
PNY(196E 1211) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 385.12
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 162
Reflection 188
Parallax 167
132% 172 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 164
Splatting 122
110% 136 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 120%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 535 Series 480GB-$180
365GB free
Firmware: RG21 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
64% Good
Read 516
Write 213
Mixed 306
76% 345 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 20.9
4K Mixed 20.7
77% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 96
DQ Mixed 54.8
67% 121 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64%
Great: 69%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 2,263
Write 1,339
Mixed 1,466
373% 1,689 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 28.6
159% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 41.7
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 27.5
34% 59 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 222%
Great: 283%
PNY SSD2SC480G1CS1754D117-514 480GB
208GB free
Firmware: CS111101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 412
Write 407
Mixed 400
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 67.6
4K Mixed 28.9
109% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 65.4
107% 205 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 99%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93
3TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 148
Write 149
Mixed 144
111% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 2.48
4K Mixed 0.21
105% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 85%
Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93
3TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 157
Mixed 143
116% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 2.47
4K Mixed 0.2
102% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2934 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 37
MC Mixed 33
105% 36.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 37.5
SC Mixed 27.5
85% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Killer SLI/ac Builds (Compare 376 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Killer SLI/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $391
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback