Lenovo 10AECTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 10AECTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '21 at 11:16
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 80.7
1-Core 36.2
2-Core 99.8
46% 72.2 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 276
27% 220 Pts
64-Core 546
34% 546 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Legend(17AA 309B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4326
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
3.52% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 6.9
3% 4.43 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.1
4% 5.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.52%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$55
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 31 16 14 36 4.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 415
Write 298
Mixed 212
SusWrite 51.7
54% 244 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 21.1
4K Mixed 9.8
47% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 83.5
DQ Mixed 17.8
35% 70.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
51.6% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.8
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.5
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10AECTO1WW Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10AECTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback