HP HPE-325be

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP HPE-325be  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20120105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '21 at 00:42
Run Duration409 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 92
1-Core 79.9
2-Core 152
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 344
36% 291 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.10.2
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
20% Poor
Lighting 24.8
Reflection 27.2
Parallax 34.6
20% 28.9 fps
MRender 25.8
Gravity 26.9
Splatting 20.7
20% 24.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 127 71 70 68 68 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.2% Average
Read 231
Write 215
Mixed 201
SusWrite 102
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 20.7
80% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 154
125% 177 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 87%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
711GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 95 94 95 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 82
Write 95.7
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 94.2
59% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 58%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
931GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 110 110 110 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 108
Write 101
Mixed 57.4
SusWrite 110
69% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160B.C8F0 9B852C80 CT51264BA160B.C8F0 9E02 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 9E02 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.3% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 12
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 11.1
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HPE-325be Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP HPE-325be

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $438
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback