Asus PB60

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus PB60  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PB60
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210708
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateOct 12 '21 at 13:14
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700T
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 82.6
1-Core 123
2-Core 245
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 721
74% 596 Pts
64-Core 828
51% 828 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Asus(1043 877F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4974
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.6% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 7.8
5% 7.43 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 7
Splatting 11.1
7% 8.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.6%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30200P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 244 265 266 232 234 MB/s
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.1% Good
Read 89.4
Write 196
Mixed 214
SusWrite 233
42% 183 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 68
4K Mixed 22.9
108% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 184
174% 273 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 83%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
895GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 432 440 432 374 385 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 445
Mixed 374
SusWrite 416
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 82.5
4K Mixed 45.8
151% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 284
228% 323 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 108%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 11.7
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 12.5
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PB60 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus PB60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback