MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	56.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C52
Motherboard	MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200610
Uptime	4.7 Days
Run Date	Oct 12 '21 at 10:52
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 50,446 User benchmarks, average bench 75% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	77% Very good	Memory 73.3 1-Core 136 2-Core 257 84% 155 Pts	4-Core 434 8-Core 675 68% 554 Pts	64-Core 668 41% 668 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Nvidia(10DE 139D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56.8% Above average	Lighting 71.6 Reflection 106 Parallax 75.7 58% 84.3 fps	MRender 63.7 Gravity 75 Splatting 60.4 54% 66.4 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Emtec X150 480GB 1,954 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 188 59 111 79 111 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	82.2% Excellent	Read 482 Write 397 Mixed 349 SusWrite 112 75% 335 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 83.9 4K Mixed 36.1 141% 51.1 MB/s	DQ Read 268 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 184 169% 256 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 99%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 379GB free, PID 1078 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 85 81 85 83 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	Read 102 Write 103 Mixed 58.6 SusWrite 83.8 116% 86.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata 1x16GB 6,485 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	51% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 16.3 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 16.9 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 93.9 43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 2,993 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	437x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	322x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	302x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	222x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	199x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	164x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	129x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	77x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	51x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	84x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	68x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $298

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16