MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	57.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C52
Motherboard	MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) (all builds)
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200610
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Jun 02 '21 at 17:53
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	82%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 50,446 User benchmarks, average bench 75% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	68.6% Good	Memory 68.3 1-Core 128 2-Core 227 78% 141 Pts	4-Core 385 8-Core 461 55% 423 Pts	64-Core 483 30% 483 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Nvidia(10DE 139D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.47 Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57.3% Above average	Lighting 72.8 Reflection 76.5 Parallax 72.6 59% 74 fps	MRender 63.2 Gravity 73.5 Splatting 60.5 53% 65.7 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Emtec X150 480GB 1,954 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 222GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 193 89 11 76 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 364 Write 112 Mixed 193 SusWrite 77.7 41% 187 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 62.9 4K Mixed 28.9 106% 38.5 MB/s	DQ Read 240 DQ Write 286 DQ Mixed 180 159% 236 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 99%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 533GB free, PID 1078 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 107 106 107 107 108 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	41.5% Average	Read 84.9 Write 84.7 Mixed 53.3 SusWrite 106 112% 82.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata 1x16GB 6,485 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	44.5% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 15 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 13.8 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 2,990 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	437x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	322x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	301x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	221x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	199x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	164x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	129x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	77x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	51x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	84x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	66x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $303

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16