Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39 33,019 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	59.4% Above average	Memory 82.4 1-Core 83.9 2-Core 142 63% 103 Pts	4-Core 213 8-Core 211 28% 212 Pts	64-Core 216 13% 216 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) 258,091 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 220E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	3.06% Terrible	Lighting 3.5 Reflection 2.2 Parallax 6.2 3% 3.97 fps	MRender 5.4 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4.8 3% 4.17 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.06% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar SSD 256GB 6,360 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.9 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 400 Write 282 Mixed 278 71% 320 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 53.4 4K Mixed 16.1 86% 31.3 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 163 DQ Mixed 33.2 65% 132 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 110%
VendorCo Disk 3.0 2TB 102 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 2TB free, PID 1234 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 5.8 6.2 6.1 6.4 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	6.98% Terrible	Read 16.7 Write 1 Mixed 0.2 SusWrite 5.2 5% 5.78 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.7 99% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 6.98% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Kingston TSB16D3LS1KFG/4G 8GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	46.6% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 14.6 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 14.4 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 76.3 52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM