TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics66.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive22.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime12.5 Days
Run DateOct 12 '21 at 03:52
Run Duration294 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 72.8
1-Core 113
2-Core 228
76% 138 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 669
67% 547 Pts
64-Core 832
52% 832 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑
This bench: 75.8%
 Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3FC8)
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.3% Good
Lighting 94.7
Reflection 89
Parallax 78.4
77% 87.4 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 81.4
Splatting 29
45% 58.8 fps
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 66.3%
 Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900J13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 53 44 47 49 46 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.3% Poor
Read 117
Write 85
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 72.4
18% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 16.4
4K Mixed 9.9
42% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 10.8
DQ Write 12.1
DQ Mixed 11.5
9% 11.5 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 22.3%
 Great: 96%
Sabrent Dual SATA Bridge 1.5TB
976GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 116 117 117 116 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 126
Write 38.5
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 117
61% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑
This bench: 69.8%
 Great: 70%
Sabrent Dual SATA Bridge 1TB
464GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 57 59 53 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 119
Write 49.3
Mixed 30
SusWrite 55.1
46% 63.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑
This bench: 50.1%
 Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.8% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 14.3
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 12.6
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 95.1
42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 41.8%
 Great: 58%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,035 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD  $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples876x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD  $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples718x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples546x
GPU
RX 570AMD  $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples460x
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples429x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples407x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples205x
Green 240GB (2018)WD  $56Bench 45%, 156,194 samples156x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples153x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples132x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples127x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples115x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $348
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback