Notebook PC5x_7xHP_HR_HS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 132%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemNotebook PC5x_7xHP_HR_HS  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook PC5x_7xHP_HR_HS
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 11 '21 at 18:38
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 70.8
1-Core 178
2-Core 352
104% 200 Pts
4-Core 696
8-Core 1,122
112% 909 Pts
64-Core 1,521
94% 1,521 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 100%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 65F1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7212
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 186
Reflection 195
Parallax 176
152% 186 fps
MRender 170
Gravity 139
Splatting 120
114% 143 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 131%
Great: 144%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
543GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 233010WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1179 373 371 371 374 377 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1,519
Write 1,797
Mixed 1,440
SusWrite 507
296% 1,316 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 223
4K Mixed 81
301% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,330
DQ Write 1,001
DQ Mixed 1,287
929% 1,206 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 236%
Great: 276%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X16GE2666C18S4 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 29.3
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 18.9
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 99.4
40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PC5x_7xHP_HR_HS Builds (Compare 200 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Notebook PC5x_7xHP_HR_HS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback