Acer Aspire A315-21

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-21  (all builds)
MotherboardSR Squirtle_SR
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170512
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 11 '21 at 13:50
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-9120 APU (2016 M.SR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Memory 60.3
1-Core 46.9
2-Core 73.8
39% 60.3 Pts
4-Core 70.1
8-Core 68.5
9% 69.3 Pts
64-Core 73.6
5% 73.6 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Acer(1025 1192) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
2.06% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 3
2% 3.1 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.06%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8480G 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 340 343 362 339 343 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 297
Write 332
Mixed 262
SusWrite 343
70% 308 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 29.9
108% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 148
117% 164 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 99%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AM00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 101 102 99 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 96.5
Write 105
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 101
62% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5624-003.A00G Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 12GB
1200, 1200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.9% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 7.1
21% 7.43 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.4
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A315-21 Builds (Compare 338 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-21

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback