Lenovo 81NB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81NB  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210127
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 10 '21 at 18:05
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User JOR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 74.9
1-Core 120
2-Core 181
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 551
54% 445 Pts
64-Core 554
34% 554 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3801) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.10.1
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Lighting 15.3
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 23.3
12% 17.4 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 18.6
Splatting 13.2
12% 14.2 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$95
285GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 899 437 435 439 440 439 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 1,548
Write 1,695
Mixed 1,329
SusWrite 515
285% 1,272 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 65.2
226% 82.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,039
DQ Write 498
DQ Mixed 790
581% 776 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 198%
Great: 237%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
595GB free
Firmware: EB01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 116 115 116 117 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 64.2
Write 82.4
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 114
60% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Kingston 99U5700-027.A00G 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
68.9% Good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 21.2
68% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 23.1
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 90.5
44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81NB Builds (Compare 231 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81NB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback