HP ProDesk 400 G2 MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 23 months ago.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G2 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 198E
Memory5.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180517
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateOct 10 '21 at 16:19
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590S-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 81.7
2-Core 158
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 251
36% 264 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.5% Average
Lighting 56.7
Reflection 77.3
Parallax 57.8
46% 63.9 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 57.9
Splatting 50.9
47% 58.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 456
Write 439
Mixed 376
94% 424 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 81
4K Mixed 29.3
125% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 154
136% 211 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
442GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 175 213 201 199 198 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
75.2% Very good
Read 246
Write 230
Mixed 233
SusWrite 194
51% 226 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 43.6
144% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 191
144% 192 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
34GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 174 211 201 199 195 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
74.5% Very good
Read 241
Write 222
Mixed 227
SusWrite 193
50% 221 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 44.6
142% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 191
144% 192 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 129%
WD WD2500YS-18SHB1 250GB
99GB free
Firmware: 20.06C06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 49.2
Write 45
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 40
31% 42.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 12GB
1333, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.9% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 10
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 10.4
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G2 MT Builds (Compare 573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G2 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $122
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback